I n t r a F o u n d a t i o n  S o f t w a r e
Making Atomic Warfare Fun Again

Need a shoulder to cry on while trying to convince Windows to properly work with our software? Just want to chat about something related to the site? Feel free to use the forums slash news slash blog.

(Unsolicited commercial spam will be deleted, obviously.)


This is thread 74. There complete list of threads is available on the main forums page.

Subject: cfx_getusergroups and domain authentication
Author: Stephen Hait
Date/Time: 2002 January 05 09:02.29AM (74.0)

Recent change on client site using this tag - a switch, I think, to authentication by domain. The examples.cfm template used to return a long list of users followed by groups then users/groups. It now returns only 4 users: Administrator, Guest, IUSR_NTSERVER, IWAM_NTSERVER, no global groups and only a few local groups.

FWIW, this change now requires logging in to the FTP server as "domain\user" instead of previous "user".

I'm sorry I can't describe this situation any better.

Is there a way to deal with this situation when using cfx_getusergroups?

If I additional info would be helpful, I would be glad to try to provide it.

TIA

Subject: RE:cfx_getusergroups and domain authentication
Author: Lewis A. Sellers
Date/Time: 2002 January 05 11:57.25AM (75.74)

getusers, as I recall, was fairly simple in that it is aware only of the NT4-ish local users. If you folks have switched to something more complicated you'll have to try the more advanced CFX_Users and CFX_Groups tags, which... as I believe I recall... should handle such things. That is, all the newer W2K stuff.

Hopefuly. :)

Then again, it's been a very long time since I've actively worked with such things and I've forgotten how most of it works.

--min

Subject: RE:cfx_getusergroups and domain authentication
Author: Stephen Hait
Date/Time: 2002 January 05 03:46.29PM (76.74)

Thanks. I installed the latest CFX_Users and CFX_Groups tags - still just showing the minimal groups. This must be an issue on the client's end re: their recent changes to security settings.



REPLY

Author:
Email:
Subject:
Your
Message:


top